{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-5635","body_sha256":"35fa345682d6577cbd257476e855e08b46bb7573d2e86c5c097f2bd5f5bc40f7","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"standards","topics":[{"id":"standards","evidence":"rds:\nOne of the things I learned is that the FCC exposure limits neglect to account for accumulated exposure.  Their standards ar"},{"id":"mechanisms","evidence":"d by RF/EMF:\nNext, the FCC does not consider heavy metals in a person's body that may reflect, magnify, and/or amplify var"},{"id":"directed","evidence":", amplified, and cumulative EMF/RF waves are weaponized by these strategic and tactical leverage dynamics while at the s"},{"id":"neurological","evidence":"ion, loss of mobility, dizziness, headaches, cognitive dysfunction, the ability to swallow, loss of weight, pain in the ears, tinni"}],"summary":"A patient advocate argues that FCC limits overlook cumulative and pulsed exposure, proposes metal-amplification and entrainment mechanisms, and alleges weaponized RF injury and diagnostic gaps.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-27T23:26:06Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"c5833b5b123320f6f148c72febfa1663250e9eaf4afd0641c16c4ffae1badb60","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}