{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-5169","body_sha256":"b9e063296bebf5f2f6dcc5273395263478894d38ac04e102023967a310ab936c","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"ehs","topics":[{"id":"ehs","evidence":" to environmental exposures resulted in them developing sensitivites to wireless technology. I don't know anyone who was actually injured by using wireless "},{"id":"access","evidence":"rfered with being able to work and even with access to many buildings. I don't know the ins and outs of legislative issues surrounding"},{"id":"section-704","evidence":" have managed to pass laws that even make it illegal for residents of a community to oppose cell towers and 5G technology on health grounds. I have read that In 1996 the telecom industry got a law passed "},{"id":"research","evidence":"orefront, I support all possible caution and investigation into these issues rather than a continued violation of consumers' rights to protec"}],"summary":"Describes people who developed wireless sensitivity after environmental illness and face work and building-access barriers, questions restrictions on local health objections, and advocates investigation.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-27T19:20:49Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"743643d07188c3f50d9cf1b4ff84d2a9fab2a9330c1547e559bf79f0ea7066ea","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}