{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-4753","number":"4753","name":"Teresa Briggs","organization":"","posted":"2026-10-26T04:00Z","received":"2026-10-17T04:00Z","body":"The science industry is flooded with scientific information concerning this issue of electromagnetic fields (EMFs), radiofrequency (RF) radiation, and wireless radiation exposure and the mere fact that the question continues to be sought for response leads one to believe that there is enough concern to request comments so I appreciate the opportunity in hopes my comments are weighed and taken seriously. \nHHS/NIH knows already of the emergence of technologies in the arena of humans and health-care and our input requires swift action. As a nation we have embarked upon an experimental era of coexisting with emerging technologies: artificial intelligence, biotechnology, brain computer interface technology, nanotechnology, directed energy, and quantum technology (CRS IF1110). I have become victim subject to dangerous levels of wireless radiation exposure. I can't upload images for evidence because my library of intellectual property containing pictorial works have yet to be properly documented and registered with the U.S. Copyright Office. Emerging technologies coupled with 5G millimeter EMR is the commonality between biology, biotechnology, and IoT wireless connectivity, architectural infrastructures are the backbone of research and experimental development and discovery fueling the 21st Century Bioeconomy. Humans and health-care are inclusive and have become the bedrock foundation harnessing engineered programmable artificial DNA/RNA consumer cellular technologies, operatable only by means of wireless internet of things connectivity. Without the powerful use of radiation electromagnetics, radiofrequency radiation, and influx of internet of things Wi-Fi wireless connectivity devices: antennas, sensors, biosensors, RFID tags, biotechnology and recent developments of chemical technology vaccines coupled with directed energy there would not exist wireless radiation exposure neither could there be excitation operation of these materials, devices, tools and communication infrastructures. With the ongoing deployment of 6G and the coexistence of artificial intelligent in humans, brAIn and health-care transparency and action is required including readdressing current laws such as HHS/NIH 45 CFR Part 46 and EPA 40 Part 26 Protection of Human Subjects (clinical, experimental, and medical research). \nAs a citizen of the United States with extensive knowledge on the direction of Americas' economy, I submit comments on behalf of the general population (particularly the vulnerable); for the good, safety, and welfare of all communities and environments. I demand real commitment to legal framework at the federal and State level to allow regulation of artificial intelligence in humans and the health-care ecosystem and across-industries having direct impact on electronic-magnetic fields, radiofrequency radiation, 5G IoT wireless connectivity instituting real changes to policy governing emerging technologies. No longer can agencies and institutions co-partner, create, develop, deploy, and award investigations and report back to directors and advisory boards to generate agendas, congregate in meetings, sit on webinars and post blogs. Daily the public is being exposed to dangerous levels of electromagnetic radiation radio frequency radiation from wireless device environments. It's not merely a question about \"radiation exposure from cellphone\" and FDA \"SARS limits. Leadership at the FCC does not consist of doctors, patients or scientist but engineers and lawyers.\nCurrently there is no plan or formal scientific consensus within the global medical industry to establish electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) as a medical diagnosis although the World Health Organization acknowledges that symptoms individuals experience are real and can be disabling however controlled \"double-blind\" studies have consistently shown that affected individuals cannot reliably detect electromagnetic fields. In past history this may have been the scientific conclusion and as a result mainstream medicine treats electromagnetic hypersensitivity as an \"idiopathic environmental intolerance\" which means symptoms are acknowledge but are not scientifically linked to wireless radiation. \nUpon legal scrutiny, security, copyright protections and registration and trademark with all rights reserved as the owner of my IP portfolio I will release authenticated photographs to the public. There will be national call to address \"the legal and ethical issues that confront society due to artificial intelligence\" this includes AI in humans and health-care and implications on privacy, transparency and plain language, consent and documentation of consent, surveillance, bias or discrimination, algorithmic discrimination, data breaches, inaccuracy or mistakes in (AI) procedural protocols, device to device protocols,  large scale healthcare cybersecurity / IoT wireless interconnect within an conglomerate electromagnetic radiation environment.","attachments":[],"attachment_inventory":true,"withheld":false,"source":"https://www.regulations.gov/comment/HHS-OASH-2026-0397-4753","tags":["health-experiences","biology-metabolism","exposure-places","policy-standards","research-evidence"],"source_hash":"76b34e4b5c880461bdb603e9cdbddf4fc32d6ed360d3afa739cd8ebdb7362bd7","slug":"health-experiences-comment-4753","classification":{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-4753","body_sha256":"64c21d932b3dbfb5f43eb881ce2f497865ecd3fd85ec1f7878335d25b2d2e415","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"ehs","topics":[{"id":"ehs","evidence":"hin the global medical industry to establish electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) as a medical diagnosis although the World Health Organizat"},{"id":"privacy","evidence":"n humans and health-care and implications on privacy, transparency and plain language, consent and documentation of consent, survei"},{"id":"directed","evidence":"mputer interface technology, nanotechnology, directed energy, and quantum technology (CRS IF1110). I have become victim subje"},{"id":"standards","evidence":"G IoT wireless connectivity instituting real changes to policy governing emerging technologies. No longer can agencies and inst"},{"id":"research","evidence":"as HHS/NIH 45 CFR Part 46 and EPA 40 Part 26 Protection of Human Subjects (clinical, experimental, and medical research). \nAs a citizen of"}],"summary":"The commenter reports harmful wireless exposure and alleges links between emerging technologies, biotechnology and wireless networks. They request stronger consent, privacy and human-subject protections and discuss how medicine currently characterizes EHS.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-26T22:22:05Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"394e885d47733c91fe208022935a82e222f9b0efaa4a676b4a4de801a377f718","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"},"forum_topics":["ehs","privacy","directed","standards","research"],"primary_topic":"ehs","forum_title":"The commenter reports harmful wireless exposure and alleges links between emerging technologies, biotechn…"}