{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-4753","body_sha256":"64c21d932b3dbfb5f43eb881ce2f497865ecd3fd85ec1f7878335d25b2d2e415","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"ehs","topics":[{"id":"ehs","evidence":"hin the global medical industry to establish electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) as a medical diagnosis although the World Health Organizat"},{"id":"privacy","evidence":"n humans and health-care and implications on privacy, transparency and plain language, consent and documentation of consent, survei"},{"id":"directed","evidence":"mputer interface technology, nanotechnology, directed energy, and quantum technology (CRS IF1110). I have become victim subje"},{"id":"standards","evidence":"G IoT wireless connectivity instituting real changes to policy governing emerging technologies. No longer can agencies and inst"},{"id":"research","evidence":"as HHS/NIH 45 CFR Part 46 and EPA 40 Part 26 Protection of Human Subjects (clinical, experimental, and medical research). \nAs a citizen of"}],"summary":"The commenter reports harmful wireless exposure and alleges links between emerging technologies, biotechnology and wireless networks. They request stronger consent, privacy and human-subject protections and discuss how medicine currently characterizes EHS.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-26T22:22:05Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"394e885d47733c91fe208022935a82e222f9b0efaa4a676b4a4de801a377f718","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}