{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-3455","body_sha256":"68af99642c60202f1390025611f048c6b907beeea500fb953b2a4dac7de3bcc1","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"ehs","topics":[{"id":"ehs","evidence":"cate for the official medical recognition of Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity (EHS). Current public exposure standards fail to account for non"},{"id":"standards","evidence":"I am writing to formally request stricter regulations on anthropogenic electromagnetic fields (EMFs) and to advocate f"},{"id":"mechanisms","evidence":"m a delayed or impaired cellular response to DNA double-strand breaks when exposed to EMFs, providing clear evidence of genetic vulner"},{"id":"research","evidence":"ogical safety limits, I submit the following peer-reviewed scientific studies:\n1. On DNA Damage and Genetic Toxicity:\nSonzo"}],"summary":"Calls for medical recognition of EHS and stricter nonthermal exposure limits, citing biomarker, DNA-repair and prevalence research and requesting dedicated care protocols.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-17T20:52:40Z","review_method":"Source-based AI review of complete published bodies; neutral attribution and exact topic evidence.","review_source_sha256":"99f7a87fda94cd486a3774f2410643434c866402a9825b59d6ae240269840e1c","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}