{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-2062","body_sha256":"6eb64e595bf3c884a4d44f21e48fb8a527c4e39b749a82c6e2a52659f81849cd","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"occupational","topics":[{"id":"occupational","evidence":"As a professional Network Technician who has been in the IT Industry for well over 20 years"},{"id":"research","evidence":"uations are the exception, and not the rule. Scientific research on typical exposure shown no adverse affects. Any clai"},{"id":"ehs","evidence":"se affects. Any claims by a person asserting sensitivity to RF Radiation under normal operating conditions tend to se"},{"id":"standards","evidence":"stry for well over 20 years, I find the DHHS regulations to be quite frankly absurd. I have been exposed to EMF"}],"summary":"An experienced network technician reports no health problems from routine exposure, distinguishes extreme exposures, questions sensitivity claims, and argues resources should address other health priorities.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-10T00:02:05Z","review_method":"Complete published comment-body review; identical previously reviewed bodies reused with separate official IDs preserved. Attachments and external links not reviewed.","review_source_sha256":"7b7e6be2d24e61fc4f96a061cbd247ac099e474e730e0e3d98ac40d665e7b0fc","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}