{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-1296","body_sha256":"397e6da5a56cbc34ad8257a3ef7c15d083053820678031c291712971005a085b","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"ehs","topics":[{"id":"ehs","evidence":"on the ANRES Australian National Register of Environmental Sensitivities. \nI do not lead a normal life and I am forced to live "},{"id":"access","evidence":"ead a normal life and I am forced to live in relative solitude in tranquil surroundings to stay out of EMF as much as"},{"id":"standards","evidence":"risprudence in terms of public health that a Precautionary Principle ought to have been applied as many countries have done"},{"id":"optical","evidence":"y alternatives to EMF tech that includes the fibre optic tech that would mean electricity running through wires"},{"id":"research","evidence":"y local councilors in regards to the lack of cumulative studies and quick permit approvals that are apparently outside"}],"summary":"Describes environmental sensitivity and isolation, questions cumulative exposure and planning oversight, and supports precaution and wired alternatives.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-05T20:06:38Z","review_method":"Full published comment-body review; exact shared paragraphs read once and reused losslessly; distinct official IDs preserved. Attachments and external links not reviewed.","review_source_sha256":"a907f63b58ec0a08bcc71a01c5b588becf0edcd597305c6799e69d9936cfd975","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}