{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-0900","body_sha256":"d4a9c75ca674e754be98706c21e589c5b3d606cd3cc4ff697fba10b2c4813dc8","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"standards","topics":[{"id":"standards","evidence":"people's nervous systems are reactive to even small amounts of EMF.  cell phone standards for radiation are way too lax.  at least match Europe's standards, which are a lot lower.  the proliferation of c"},{"id":"ehs","evidence":"EMF sensitivity is real.  some people's nervous systems are reactive to even small amounts of EMF.  cell phone stan"},{"id":"infrastructure","evidence":"at least match Europe's standards, which are a lot lower.  the proliferation of cell phone towers/antennae is way too unregulated because exposure is not allowed to be considered in many jurisdicti"}],"summary":"Argues that some people are sensitive to low EMF exposures and calls for tighter phone and tower regulation, citing European standards and restrictions on considering exposure in siting decisions.","reviewed_at":"2026-09-26T00:33:07Z","review_method":"Source-matched AI review of 50 complete new comment bodies; four attachment-only submissions remain pending. Exact supporting passages; attachments not reviewed.","review_source_sha256":"88ffece1864e4d0886693f3f0632417ea6a0a2ea1fec26524037ada2de274869","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}