HHS-OASH-2026-0397-6876
https://www.regulations.gov/comment/HHS-OASH-2026-0397-6876

Persistent Activation of voltage-gated calcium channels by EMF causes this system to collapse due to not enough time to recover, it induces cellular stress and blood cell shape changes then cells clump.   Continuous EMF exposure transforms into a trigger for cellular dysfunction, structural damage and even cell death.  This can be seen by looking at ones blood through a dark field microscope both before and after exposure to EMF.  I am concerned that multiple transmitters of 4G and 5G are being put up everywhere in Los Angeles, where I reside.  The adverse effects of exposure to EMF is known so it makes no sense to create this excessive EMF atmosphere.  Fiber optic cables are faster, safer and more secure than wireless communications.  I object to the placement of 5G transmitters above sidewalks to shoot calls, data and video at us in our homes and other buildings.  It is known that the higher 5G signal power, affects first water molecules and then oxygen molecule uptake into our lungs and blood.  There was no lag in wireless signal for anyone or location that I was aware of 10 years ago, in Los Angeles.  If there is some appliance or device a person wants to operate wirelessly, it can be run off WiFi signaling, indoors.  It is unsafe to operate using a signal from outside a home or building.  Fiber optic cables have been installed everywhere but stops at our sidewalks.  It was intended to be run the next 30 feet into our homes.  Exposing all residents in my city or any city to EMF, everywhere, all the time, is not okay.  It unnaturally opens calcium channels and will do so constantly which causes damage and death to cells.  It clumps blood.  It is obvious that every safety rule Congress put in The Communications Act is being ignored.  Localities are to have control over the operation of wireless transmitters but telecoms are getting over on local officials.  Many residents operating motorized vehicles or just walking, are irresponsibly looking down at wireless phones or screens and do not exhibit any sense of the danger they pose to others or to their own health.  I do think if I were you I would take all the truth into consideration and decide what is best for the health of residents and nature.  Thank you.