{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-6125","body_sha256":"8d7bc94ce7b540755094f9372ff01b772ca3ff7f344bed4a15278e08535d8993","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"infrastructure","topics":[{"id":"infrastructure","evidence":" chronic, close-range exposure (<25 feet) to cell tower mast hardware on a residential building. This exposure was continuous"},{"id":"cardiac","evidence":"n my immediate living environment required a cardiac pacemaker during their residency near this specific transmitter array. Thi"},{"id":"standards","evidence":"ure framework (47 CFR § 1.1310). The current Max Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits are structurally deficient:\n1. Outdated 1996 Baseli"},{"id":"section-704","evidence":"cumulative exposure.\n3. Preemption Gaps: The Telecommunications Act of 1996 blocks local municipalities from restricting placements based on"},{"id":"research","evidence":"s-Referencing: I urge the HHS to establish a collaborative research pipeline between the FDA, CDC, and FCC to cross-reference localized, time"}],"summary":"Describes close residential tower exposure and a neighbor's pacemaker, and proposes updated standards, detailed measurements, public power logs and cardiovascular research.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-28T23:54:32Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"e5b7d1f366ff1656f18dcb430a35ebf33c135caec46ad73b6a5ea3f39c7fc58c","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}