{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-5491","body_sha256":"bee66e3aadcf3ada3f03ba93778c46d19b9357c3176e8ee1d1d491b6073e2f9d","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"standards","topics":[{"id":"standards","evidence":"It does not make sense that the policy has not changed over 30 years despite the sign having changed, and that it does not factor in "},{"id":"infrastructure","evidence":"t developments, showing the toxic effects of proximity to these cell towers.\n\nIt doesn’t make sense."}],"summary":"Questions why policy has remained unchanged for decades despite what the commenter describes as emerging evidence of effects near towers.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-27T23:26:06Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"20673e3b57b765ffb2106a91cb2cc36723fbd3111294f3058d3aeeb8e28057dd","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}