{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-5289","number":"5289","name":"AJ Elterman","organization":"","posted":"2026-10-27T04:00Z","received":"2026-10-21T04:00Z","body":"\nFirst, we don't need more research and studies.  The scientific community already has more than 20,000 studies.   This is an established science.  \t   \nWe have more than enough studies to put in place much stronger regulations and bans. \n\nScientists for Wired Technology (scientists4wiredtech.com) is an excellent in-depth scientific knowledge base on the hazards of continuous exposures to pulsed, data-modulated, Radio-frequency Electromagnetic Microwave Radiation (RF-EMR), which is a manmade, toxic, highly xenobiotic agent that causes systemic biological damages at levels many thousands of times lower than current U.S. RF-EMR radiation exposure guidelines.\nSee especially \"The Largest Unethical Human Experiment In Human History\" on that website.\n\nThe FCC is not a health and environmental agency.  So why has it been in charge of defining what is acceptable for humans and other living beings? \n\nWe need scientific standards (set in collaboration with ANSI and public health experts) based on the solid knowledge gained for the past 70 years, --not mere guidelines -- let alone outdated ones from 1996, which were rubberstamped for their 1965 version or even as old as 1953!? \n\nWe also know what microwave sickness looks like and why this RF-EMR technology is so suitable  for use by the military as a weapon.\n\nThe mere fact that wired technology is \nfaster (has the speed of light), \nmuch more energy-efficient, \nsecure (not hackable like wireless), \nmuch longer lasting (30-50 years vs. 5-6 years for wireless), \nsafer, \nprovides more privacy, \ndoes not depress home values, AND\nhas already been subsidized to the tune of billions of US tax payer dollars  (Irregulators vs. FCC) -- should be sufficient to immediately stop the wireless and 5G buildup, set scientific standards, and ask the telecom industry to fulfill their paid obligation and complete the wiring with copper and fiber optic cable networks to provide real and safe broadband to every community in the country, especially including the last half-mile or so from the street into homes.  \n\nWhat is the justification for choosing the slower, energy guzzling, unsafe, hackable, privacy invading, wasteful (think of all the additional junk generated with each upgrade of wireless technology every few years), and posing a fire risk (as with smart meters) to boot -- over its opposite?  \nWhat is \"green\" about this technology?\n","attachments":[],"attachment_inventory":true,"withheld":false,"source":"https://www.regulations.gov/comment/HHS-OASH-2026-0397-5289","tags":["exposure-places","policy-standards","research-evidence"],"source_hash":"0a4577d5de0938223a710d572aa7832c83c7f1c83743c5baabc3606ffe55a12b","slug":"exposure-places-comment-5289","classification":{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-5289","body_sha256":"e353b1d0297113a47b72cc39878cb63a5ebb00ecb75ff57cdcf002ec5f5ad1e6","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"standards","topics":[{"id":"standards","evidence":"ave more than enough studies to put in place much stronger regulations and bans. \n\nScientists for Wired Technology (scientists4wiredtech.com) is"},{"id":"optical","evidence":"paid obligation and complete the wiring with copper and fiber optic cable networks to provide real and safe broadband to every community in the cou"},{"id":"research","evidence":"e scientific community already has more than 20,000 studies.   This is an established science.  \t   \nWe have more than enoug"},{"id":"privacy","evidence":" years vs. 5-6 years for wireless), \nsafer, \nprovides more privacy, \ndoes not depress home values, AND\nhas already been subsidized "}],"summary":"Argues that existing evidence warrants stronger regulation and a halt to wireless expansion, and advocates completing wired broadband networks instead.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-27T19:20:49Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"79972e28087affc68013e05f27d1d82b0d2e49e5d52899cc8c95ff31d4a11fd2","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"},"forum_topics":["standards","optical","research","privacy"],"primary_topic":"standards","forum_title":"Argues that existing evidence warrants stronger regulation and a halt to wireless expansion, and advocate…"}