{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-4945","body_sha256":"860b40d0232eb096c7abd186703bbc7d3fcc54f20b100c311a26cf0df774d3fc","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"standards","topics":[{"id":"standards","evidence":"\n\nI respectfully request:\n\nThe US adopts the precautionary principle including non-thermal effects standards like China, Italy, Poland, Russia and Eastern Europe of safety l"},{"id":"access","evidence":"nequal application of shielding protections.\nEquitable RF protections for residents of federally subsidized housing.\nDevelopment of state-level RF exposure guidance that prioritize"},{"id":"children","evidence":"s health and environmental justice concerns:\nLow-income, elderly, and disabled residents are left disproportionately exposed while protections are provid"},{"id":"infrastructure","evidence":" Longmont, Colorado. Our building is located directly across from a cell tower and experiences continuous radio frequency (RF) exposure, measur"}],"summary":"A subsidized-housing resident reports RF exposure and relief after shielding, alleges unequal shielding protections, and requests lower limits and equitable protection for elderly and disabled residents.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-26T22:22:05Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"42c85c9f4240af56e5c1b57d9340424251175f8086bdc864ef0739fc98fd511e","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}