{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-4393","body_sha256":"0f2b29498e9b3ffc8ee4156fdeed198309e04f04d381ccda16b29f62a83b3b42","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"occupational","topics":[{"id":"occupational","evidence":"pational-health decisions should account for actual energized maintenance conditions and simultaneous sources. Current and retired technicians should"},{"id":"research","evidence":"s. Current and retired technicians should be included in the research and follow-up needed to resolve those questions."},{"id":"standards","evidence":"ory aid supporting task-specific assessment, accessible exposure records and meaningful communication of findings to workers and physicia"}],"summary":"The commenter explains a schematic occupational radar-site exhibit, distinguishes it from measured exposure or proof of harm, and requests task-specific assessment, accessible records and research involving current and retired technicians.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-24T20:09:12Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"2267a22986d1e31b1e8bf09fa6a80c9a44c0f8ca50ecf34f3aa2ab668913440f","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}