{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-3992","body_sha256":"34b192f67e9a6c9f82e89fc8493bb4d2d990169f2f9cd0db52eb2ae661f63e3b","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"standards","topics":[{"id":"standards","evidence":"environment.\nDue to this, there is no valid, legal technical documentation for either AI or digital radiation technology.\n\nWhen there is no"},{"id":"research","evidence":"se cases, journalists can enlist the help of independent external experts to decipher \nthe documentation and reveal that a product violate"},{"id":"environment","evidence":" \nfor technology being used in a manner that benefits humanity, the environment and society.\n\nEngineers, product developers must strive to improve technolog"}],"summary":"An engineer argues that digital radiation and AI products lack adequate legal safety documentation, calls for transparency and accountability, and outlines professional duties to protect people and the environment.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-21T23:43:28Z","review_method":"Complete submitted comment-text review with neutral attributed summaries and exact evidence; attachments and external materials not reviewed.","review_source_sha256":"7d8e41015db16041f251c18738dc876e39538bc69fb5aaee84ed1ead5e48196d","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}