{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-3906","body_sha256":"ef15d45639e12d1b0d58ff903f19330016feb8af85b49d3375ba61b2441edbe1","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"other","topics":[{"id":"other","evidence":"be dangerous, BUT so can lower frequencies.  What counts is the POWER; you are not going to be climbing up and placing your body in fr"},{"id":"infrastructure","evidence":"atts.  In the field (where we hang out), the electrical field from that antenna is reduced to a tiny value.  The transmitter of the phone you ar"},{"id":"occupational","evidence":"I have been an RF (radio frequency) radio broadcast engineer for 60 years.  I hold a General Class Radiotelephone License from the FCC.  I"}],"summary":"A longtime broadcast engineer argues that power and proximity matter more than frequency alone, considers handheld transmitters more concerning than distant antennas, and states that ordinary radio-field exposure has caused no measurable damage.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-21T23:43:28Z","review_method":"Complete submitted comment-text review with neutral attributed summaries and exact evidence; attachments and external materials not reviewed.","review_source_sha256":"2e9adb0791a14e32864c2a818a9587c9407278f0b1ae83ebce43fd202f3c1e91","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}