{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-3552","body_sha256":"989096c8260446cda8826c81a8617a44c9e6849f27778c70fb998e7a4dc9f146","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"research","topics":[{"id":"research","evidence":"llustrates why ongoing scientific review and independent verification remain important for public confidence in RF exposure assessment"},{"id":"infrastructure","evidence":"ng near a site hosting multiple mobile phone base stations.\n\nMy purpose is not to provide a scientific conclusion but to pr"},{"id":"standards","evidence":"uded that the installation complied with the applicable French regulations. The ANFR stated that this value was below the 6 V/m threshold u"}],"summary":"Reports a discrepancy between official and independent residential RF measurements in Paris and asks the FCC to consider monitoring methods and real-world exposure variability.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-19T22:56:19Z","review_method":"Source-based AI review of complete published bodies; neutral attribution and exact topic evidence.","review_source_sha256":"4c8256b993dc0e670613380b4e73c656c0185f90b2d99f8f3ffd99f902d43ac4","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}