{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-2615","number":"2615","name":"Anonymous Anonymous","organization":"","posted":"2026-10-14T04:00Z","received":"2026-10-11T04:00Z","body":"See attached file(s)\n\nIEEE Standards Association's 2019 guidelines to Human Exposure to EMF.  Small edits were added in 2022 called \"Corrigendum 2\".  Corrigendum 2 was appended to the standard as of June 29, 2022.  This corrigendum addressed technical corrections, specifically fixing Figure 1 and Figure 2 in the original 2019 document which were found to be incorrect.  Corrigendum 1 (C95.1-2019/Cor 1-2019) was incorporated directly into the 2019 publication and did not appear as a separate standalone standard.  The core exposure limits and scientific basis established in the 2019 edition remain the active standard, with these corrigenda serving as necessary technical amendments to the documentation.\n\n2019 IEEE Standards Association's guidelines remain the standard of safety reference still currently being used in the United States.  Other countries however have their stricter safety standards applying to EMF exposure levels.  France for example has more stringent safety standards and it is rumored that one of the latest iPhone models is banned from retail sale due to being too powerful and operates higher than European safety standards.  \n\nPlease have your professional staff reference the 2019 IEEE guidelines attached, I'm sure the staff has seen/heard of this standard before.  Also ask staff to explore the safety standards in other European nations.  With the rollout of 5G cellular networks in European states/countries, also came the beginnings of physical and mental health effects believe to be originated from 5G towers.  Complaints are very similar to the now widely recognized \"Havana Syndrome\" or Anomalous Health Incidents.","attachments":["https://downloads.regulations.gov/HHS-OASH-2026-0397-2615/attachment_1.pdf"],"attachment_inventory":true,"withheld":false,"source":"https://www.regulations.gov/comment/HHS-OASH-2026-0397-2615","tags":["exposure-places","policy-standards","research-evidence"],"source_hash":"e477ec4830a6aae466fee7a0cb61881907d1ebd98a3d75153d6b81f31ca958dc","slug":"exposure-places-comment-2615","classification":{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-2615","body_sha256":"f29285b32726efedb11c4cfdb2e86de4ef23c977617a9a6fb2780672272b9b0c","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"standards","topics":[{"id":"standards","evidence":"See attached file(s)\n\nIEEE Standards Association's 2019 guidelines to Human Exposure t"},{"id":"ahi","evidence":"y similar to the now widely recognized \"Havana Syndrome\" or Anomalous Health Incidents."},{"id":"infrastructure","evidence":"h effects believe to be originated from 5G towers.  Complaints are very similar to the now widely recognized "}],"summary":"Describes attached IEEE exposure guidelines and technical corrections, requests comparison with European standards, and relates reported 5G complaints to anomalous health incidents. The attachment is unread.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-14T13:55:48Z","review_method":"Source-based AI review of complete published comment bodies; exact evidence passages; attachments and external links not reviewed.","review_source_sha256":"5e8e32d3e89383883866787fa660a611177fd6eecbf40a3f663da24f680d39dc","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"},"forum_topics":["standards","ahi","infrastructure"],"primary_topic":"standards","forum_title":"Describes attached IEEE exposure guidelines and technical corrections, requests comparison with European …"}