{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-2076","number":"2076","name":"Anonymous Anonymous","organization":"","posted":"2026-10-09T04:00Z","received":"2026-10-09T04:00Z","body":"If you have ever learned about EM radiation then you would know what poses a danger and what doesn’t. Cell phones, WiFi, etc do not pose a risk because that type of EM radiation is non-ionizing radiation. Please spend 10 minutes reading up on ionizing vs non-ionizing radiation.","attachments":[],"attachment_inventory":true,"withheld":false,"source":"https://www.regulations.gov/comment/HHS-OASH-2026-0397-2076","tags":["exposure-places"],"source_hash":"8798468d6dd380ed87534dcf7d95958b5be6add33a8d660e27fafd85d3474ef6","slug":"exposure-places-comment-2076","classification":{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-2076","body_sha256":"5e2abc2f7b45ffc25e35bd253e0a541c2182fbda538f4567752f747a65c133ed","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"research","topics":[{"id":"research","evidence":"-ionizing radiation. Please spend 10 minutes reading up on ionizing vs non-ionizing radiation."},{"id":"wifi","evidence":"oses a danger and what doesn’t. Cell phones, WiFi, etc do not pose a risk because that type of EM radiat"}],"summary":"Argues that non-ionizing radiation from phones and Wi-Fi is not hazardous and urges basic science education.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-10T00:02:05Z","review_method":"Complete published comment-body review; identical previously reviewed bodies reused with separate official IDs preserved. Attachments and external links not reviewed.","review_source_sha256":"f0dd7c03d6d65c6d9a86f26b80195b1f45b8e3897a22a98f54ae54b13ae693d6","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"},"forum_topics":["research","wifi"],"primary_topic":"research","forum_title":"Argues that non-ionizing radiation from phones and Wi-Fi is not hazardous and urges basic science educati…"}