{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-1279","body_sha256":"4c428369ce0670328c220d94641eece9da40733478e91bec401a3c09578f2107","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"standards","topics":[{"id":"standards","evidence":"olved in pressing for setting and keeping RF exposure standards appropriate since the 1996 Telecom Act was first enact"},{"id":"section-704","evidence":"led out.   Congress's express mandate in the Telecom Act of 1996 on the FCC was that the FCC must set and keep exposure"},{"id":"environment","evidence":"s of cell radiation exposure are the Balmori White Stork study (attached).  Please also see my paper (attached)"},{"id":"infrastructure","evidence":"successfully gagged Americans from demanding safer siting for cell antennas -- for a better understanding of why"}],"summary":"Argues that FCC limits are outdated and industry influence restricts public input on antenna siting. Refers to unread papers.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-05T20:06:38Z","review_method":"Full published comment-body review; exact shared paragraphs read once and reused losslessly; distinct official IDs preserved. Attachments and external links not reviewed.","review_source_sha256":"1118026452eae59c3f9a4d2599d51a757e69b9f26d648f4bce88dc6aa6159479","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}