{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-1210","body_sha256":"ebc80d49d0402e9e9846dfff5655699f4d23d8985e6ff3af38f29f29cb38d830","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"standards","topics":[{"id":"standards","evidence":" that is not proving to be the case, we need laws and regulations to stop the increasing prevalence of radiation before "},{"id":"environment","evidence":"f radiation damage not only humans, but also domestic animals, wildlife, and even plants. It would be nice if industry was mor"},{"id":"access","evidence":"lready it is hard for those most affected to find places where they can be comfortable. However, even those who are not aware of it are being"},{"id":"research","evidence":"ectromagnetic fields and wireless radiation. Many studies have been done that show the damage can be severe, esp"}],"summary":"Calls for laws to limit expanding wireless exposure, asserting risks to people, animals and plants and difficulties finding tolerable environments. Criticizes industry influence on public information.","reviewed_at":"2026-09-30T18:41:32Z","review_method":"Source-matched AI review of 84 new published bodies; two attachment-only records and one external-link-only record remain pending. Attachments and external links not reviewed.","review_source_sha256":"7a54fdaa460c37bb387e0bb4706945102320f7e9c7854acb858c5d527ee434b9","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}