{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-6495","body_sha256":"87ca8b78219a6ab002d592946bd71256edc7795985436dfc24eb115b44bfa633","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"research","topics":[{"id":"research","evidence":"transparent so that independent, non-conflict of interest scientists can replicate"},{"id":"section-704","evidence":"Section 704"},{"id":"standards","evidence":"moratorium on any expansion"},{"id":"environment","evidence":"environment (animals, plants, etc)"}],"summary":"The commenter supports transparent independent HHS research and a moratorium on exposure expansion, while reporting no personal or known contacts’ health effects. They criticize FCC oversight, Section 704, and restrictions on local siting authority, and raise cumulative and environmental concerns.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-28T23:54:32Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"a1aa2e538fbbb7e90587e0e59ffa4635042d1d8d6b2303f91f07ce08ac965f75","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}