{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-6494","body_sha256":"a6c03f288c96139f3c10e05ddadc0e0e776563aa0f36231f8907ba7434ed3ed0","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"research","topics":[{"id":"research","evidence":"significant need for more research"},{"id":"infrastructure","evidence":"close-proximity small cells"},{"id":"children","evidence":"children, babies, pregnant women, or the elderly"},{"id":"environment","evidence":"bee populations, birds, other wildlife"},{"id":"standards","evidence":"outdated risk assessments"}],"summary":"The commenter requests independent research on 5G and nearby small cells, criticizing thermal-only standards and highlighting children, pregnancy, older people, and wildlife. They cite linked research and call for HHS action protecting public and ecosystem health.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-28T23:54:32Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"cf1e47056edffd68db3d129f7d10f2326041bf5885ecccf595ef983acab2bc92","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}