{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-6323","number":"6323","name":"Reza Ganjavi","organization":"","posted":"2026-10-28T04:00Z","received":"2026-10-21T04:00Z","body":"Current US limits for wireless RF-EMF do not protect the public or wildlife from harm. The government’s  ignorance of such a large body of scientific evidence for the biological effects of RF-EMF exposure takes us back to the Dark Ages or rather Stone Ages. The entire industry line is based on lack of biological effect, and that's echoed by ICNIRP and regulators including FCC because money talks. Let's face it folks, if this scandal was not about money, regulators would do their jobs and require safety testing, and respect public health risk prevention principles, instead of this ultra reckless attitude of exposing millions of innocent adults and children to a technology that's not only untested for safety, but also creating wireless radiation exposures at levels that extensive scientific studies clearly link to adverse health effects. Harm has been repeatedly documented at RF-EMF levels well below U.S. thermal standards which are based on the outdated and proven wrong assumption that heat is the only harm. \n\nI hope DHHS has the integrity to take this matter seriously and instead of actively and deliberately ignoring credible science as the FCC and FDA has done for years when it comes to RF-EMF exposure, to start acting responsibly and demand safety measures as you do with drugs and medical devices, and very importantly, public education on responsible use of technology.\n\nThanks for your attention. \nAttachment: 8 scientific articles. ","attachments":["https://downloads.regulations.gov/HHS-OASH-2026-0397-6323/attachment_4.pdf","https://downloads.regulations.gov/HHS-OASH-2026-0397-6323/attachment_8.pdf","https://downloads.regulations.gov/HHS-OASH-2026-0397-6323/attachment_1.pdf","https://downloads.regulations.gov/HHS-OASH-2026-0397-6323/attachment_7.pdf","https://downloads.regulations.gov/HHS-OASH-2026-0397-6323/attachment_3.pdf","https://downloads.regulations.gov/HHS-OASH-2026-0397-6323/attachment_6.pdf","https://downloads.regulations.gov/HHS-OASH-2026-0397-6323/attachment_2.pdf","https://downloads.regulations.gov/HHS-OASH-2026-0397-6323/attachment_5.pdf"],"attachment_inventory":true,"withheld":false,"source":"https://www.regulations.gov/comment/HHS-OASH-2026-0397-6323","tags":["child-development","policy-standards","research-evidence"],"source_hash":"8c774ae1fb39902b6c6d48a7b3b8c040b3681b37647fbfca79f6d5e958a47f08","slug":"child-development-comment-6323","classification":{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-6323","body_sha256":"4337d892cef39742b2734c361d78447bdec0057764d72e69bebad9459cfe57cb","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"standards","topics":[{"id":"standards","evidence":"Current US limits for wireless RF-EMF do not protect the public or wildlife from h"},{"id":"research","evidence":"radiation exposures at levels that extensive scientific studies clearly link to adverse health effects. Harm has been repeatedly"},{"id":"environment","evidence":"wireless RF-EMF do not protect the public or wildlife from harm. The government’s  ignorance of such a large body of s"}],"summary":"The commenter challenges thermal-based limits and regulatory responses to research, requesting safety testing, prevention measures and public education protecting people and wildlife.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-28T23:54:32Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"0a7506595e5c92961252fab011acb6d3994a1650e26317b56fa17e80979e61bb","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"},"forum_topics":["standards","research","environment"],"primary_topic":"standards","forum_title":"The commenter challenges thermal-based limits and regulatory responses to research, requesting safety tes…"}