{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-6323","body_sha256":"4337d892cef39742b2734c361d78447bdec0057764d72e69bebad9459cfe57cb","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"standards","topics":[{"id":"standards","evidence":"Current US limits for wireless RF-EMF do not protect the public or wildlife from h"},{"id":"research","evidence":"radiation exposures at levels that extensive scientific studies clearly link to adverse health effects. Harm has been repeatedly"},{"id":"environment","evidence":"wireless RF-EMF do not protect the public or wildlife from harm. The government’s  ignorance of such a large body of s"}],"summary":"The commenter challenges thermal-based limits and regulatory responses to research, requesting safety testing, prevention measures and public education protecting people and wildlife.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-28T23:54:32Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"0a7506595e5c92961252fab011acb6d3994a1650e26317b56fa17e80979e61bb","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}