{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-6308","body_sha256":"bd39fd0170c5c0ab04566e2223521bb434fdc0b9502e6f21fe573cd73fc76661","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"infrastructure","topics":[{"id":"infrastructure","evidence":"he experience of fighting the placement of a cellular tower within 250 feet of my home.  It only took me about 10 minutes of"},{"id":"standards","evidence":"hould at the minimum be enough to change the outdated guidelines from the FCC.  The FCC shouldn't even be able to have such a gui"},{"id":"reproductive","evidence":"many things in regard to health and safety.  Infertility and autism are on the rise here.  Has anyone thought of that pot"},{"id":"environment","evidence":"not only affects people, but it also affects animals and plants.  These are all things that should concern everyone.  I"}],"summary":"The commenter recounts opposing a tower near home, challenges FCC rules and health-related siting restrictions, and requests updated protections and assessment of broader human and ecological effects.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-28T23:54:32Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"87dc2135dc87ae0c8eddac8d92e646402a179772bcbfc09103fa48b07295e531","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}