{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-5685","body_sha256":"6f87b61c3b7b051cc3cac11288d1cb2b40a285fc425f01d631986b6d9c80cff6","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"standards","topics":[{"id":"standards","evidence":"the FCC has abdicated its duty to enact truly protective RF exposure limits."},{"id":"infrastructure","evidence":"approved a 195-foot-tall cell tower adjacent to my beautiful property"},{"id":"research","evidence":"prioritize research into the biological effects of wireless radiation"}],"summary":"Criticizes FCC exposure limits and close residential tower siting. Describes approval of a tower beside family property despite an existing nearby tower, challenges the submitted coverage justification and local decision-making, and requests stronger telecommunications accountability.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-27T23:26:06Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"f00eae4fca3114ab1350b28df116dbe52d9eef4049291632161eb4ce93401cf6","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}