{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-5675","body_sha256":"535faf25f728cfeb231ae265b651388509fcd1189a603a68a485f792e83b503e","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"infrastructure","topics":[{"id":"infrastructure","evidence":"the ability for small local communities and governments to have autonomy and the option to choose where we want to allow cell towers and small cell antennae."},{"id":"section-704","evidence":"The fact that health and environmental concerns regarding these technologies cannot be used as evidence or argument"},{"id":"research","evidence":"Health effects from EMF's, RF Radiation and Wireless Radiation Exposure NEED to be studied by non-biased groups"},{"id":"children","evidence":"It's time to protect our children, elders, animals and community as a whole."}],"summary":"Requests independent health research and stronger local authority over tower siting. Describes a community dispute over a proposed tower close to homes and argues for safety protections that preserve useful technology while considering children, older people and animals.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-27T23:26:06Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"2017ca53f6dc93ecb0bbf6fdda143ed278fd9347baa14eec36bfa3301eca7e36","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}