{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-5568","body_sha256":"7d735c6f22c8a0836237a7b0b988e76d3b6662115f1a00849c5376088208e9d7","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"standards","topics":[{"id":"standards","evidence":"vires or reviewable final agency action.\n\n1. CORRECT THE AUTHORITY CITATION. The notice says HHS is proceeding “under 21 CFR subpart J.” 91 "},{"id":"research","evidence":"striction does not automatically limit HHS’s independent research authority.\n\n3. RESEARCH POWER IS NOT UNBOUNDED REGULATORY POWER. Sections "},{"id":"electricity","evidence":"fields, not RF. HHS should separately assess power-frequency fields; RF from handheld/body-worn devices; RF from fixed infrastructur"},{"id":"occupational","evidence":"-worn devices; RF from fixed infrastructure; occupational exposures; and medical-device compatibility. Distinguish measured from mod"}],"summary":"The commenter requests correction of the RFI's authority citation, distinguishes the FCC court remand from HHS authority, discusses procedural limits on future regulation, and urges clear exposure categories and careful distinctions between reported symptoms, association and causation.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-27T23:26:06Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"439caf11d305670d62938ed5588198d74496928e7d1046ae03ac03beb8fee99e","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}