{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-5523","body_sha256":"07067fa57e5efc47abcf4d7742fb741ad0667ebf5a1657041428886b4b5575b5","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"infrastructure","topics":[{"id":"infrastructure","evidence":"ools, and daycares. I believe they should be at least one mile away or more! Every tower should also be independently tested after i"},{"id":"children","evidence":"ent research into long-term and RF exposure, especially in children.\n\nThere should absolutely be mandatory minimum setbacks between "},{"id":"research","evidence":"ireless exposure ahead of them. We need more independent research into long-term and RF exposure, especially in children.\n\nThere s"},{"id":"standards","evidence":"lly in children.\n\nThere should absolutely be mandatory minimum setbacks between wireless towers and homes, schools, and daycares. I beli"}],"summary":"A parent requests at least one-mile tower setbacks, independent exposure testing and public results, community input and long-term child-focused research.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-27T23:26:06Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"86ca970ba135bc86ef0307c25f846715cdf7fb519ecad3bf96b22d0587bce1cc","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}