{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-5369","body_sha256":"918580f4a154624239c76d46e025cf5be42c189542ff15f89aa79cb87ed4adc0","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"research","topics":[{"id":"research","evidence":"ve, multi-source exposure — as a methods and research priority.\n\nQuestions 5(n) and 9 — disclosure. What should be disclosed, i"},{"id":"standards","evidence":"aration distances that ordinary use ignores. Standardized disclosure at the point of sale and in the device itself would cost little "},{"id":"children","evidence":"urance or alarm.\n\nQuestion 11(a) — children. Children merit separate assessment. There is no minimum age for an amateur license, and young opera"}],"summary":"An amateur-radio operator calls for realistic cumulative-exposure assessment, transparent device disclosures, child-specific evaluation, reproducible dosimetry and coordinated HHS/FCC review.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-27T19:20:49Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"e29fbc0ce0ddcf39c7a043d869cea15079f22126516af95c208e6619086592fe","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}