{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-4706","body_sha256":"3d217706ee36986f69c8f6c82bc895c0d2b4d4ef514e6245c5ccd7b1fc6f0b8d","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"standards","topics":[{"id":"standards","evidence":"I urge HHS to independently reassess the scientific basis of current federal exposure limits."},{"id":"research","evidence":"I urge HHS to fund independent, reproducible research on chronic exposure"},{"id":"children","evidence":"Children’s developing bodies and the possibility of lifelong exposure beginning early in life warrant specific assessment."},{"id":"ehs","evidence":"People reporting electromagnetic sensitivity should receive respectful clinical evaluation and rigorous investigation"},{"id":"environment","evidence":"HHS should coordinate with environmental agencies to assess potential effects on wildlife, pollinators, plants, and livestock."},{"id":"optical","evidence":"including wired connections where feasible"}],"summary":"Requests independent reassessment of exposure limits, realistic device testing, clear disclosures and research on chronic exposure and vulnerable groups. Calls for respectful investigation of reported electromagnetic sensitivity, environmental assessment, transparent research governance and practical exposure-reduction guidance that explains evidence and uncertainty.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-26T22:22:05Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"9057abf7ac93b2bb0ea526329e0eaeaaf15add919449708f145c01d6e6c55de9","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}