{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-4684","body_sha256":"131dc09bef2e214ded3e66d59662e747f0f248fa8dddb2c69bc5ff4bdd2cb28a","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"access","topics":[{"id":"access","evidence":"She is a college educated woman whom would love to work but cannot because of this technology."},{"id":"infrastructure","evidence":"we had eighty cell, and sixty antennas within a three miles."},{"id":"environment","evidence":"Habitat loss cannot account for the steep reduction in all flying insects and birds."},{"id":"standards","evidence":"I beg you all to consider turning EMF frequencies down to a level that is adequate."}],"summary":"Reports a spouse’s nausea, exhaustion and severe restrictions on work and social activity attributed to wireless exposure, with improvement after moving to a low-coverage area. Also attributes declines in insects and birds to the technology and requests reduced emissions.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-26T22:22:05Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"00817caac2d70f56f456fc9557005e44daf8e517a38ebe3d4ed2108931d96322","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}