{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-4487","body_sha256":"8941a5918200b33cb8ba5c8d203fee0ce69c26031defded333ccf5c50d276c35","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"standards","topics":[{"id":"standards","evidence":"Re-evaluate exposure standards beyond simple thermal heating limits\n​The Issue: Current federal"},{"id":"mechanisms","evidence":"cellular signaling over time.\n​Disruption of cellular calcium homeostasis, affecting membrane dynamics and cellular stress protocols.\n​2. "},{"id":"children","evidence":"t safety margins for sensitive populations:\n​Children and Adolescents: Thinner skull bones, higher water content in biological tissue,"},{"id":"occupational","evidence":"d to deeper relative RF energy penetration.\n​Occupational Workers: Individuals with prolonged high-density field exposures in spec"},{"id":"cardiac","evidence":"nts.\n​Medical Device Users: Individuals with implanted cardiac or neurological electronics sensitive to external field interfer"},{"id":"optical","evidence":" low-cost \"exposure hygiene\" guidance (e.g., hardwiring home networks, keeping transmitting devices at a distance from the body during"},{"id":"research","evidence":"uld direct federal research funding toward:\n​Longitudinal epidemiology tracking health outcomes in populations with measured (rather th"}],"summary":"The commenter recommends standards addressing non-thermal and cumulative effects, protections for children, workers and medical-device users, clear exposure-reduction guidance and independent human-relevant research.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-24T20:09:12Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"bfe327bd2368cdeda7dd33bf260e514faf47d09c97574e66e2b19065fd87e782","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}