{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-4482","number":"4482","name":"Katarzyna Klimczuk","organization":"","posted":"2026-10-24T04:00Z","received":"2026-10-15T04:00Z","body":"I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure.\n\nI am responding from the perspective of a , parent, myself, healthcare professional, researcher, advocate, concerned member of the public, or other].\n\nwireless radiation has affected me significantly and also i am concerned about my child, and entire family that I  care about. The continues exposure from everywhere is unjust since there is no escape from it. I am very signifantly sensitive to is and the measures that I am taking are not enough. I am buying expensive clothes and blankets to shield myself but I am still significantly affected. It's not right that my life became a hell now without my consent and ability to opt out.  The exposure is crazy and new towers continue to grow everywhere. This needs to stop and it is unlawful because it affects everyone without asking for acceptance. I do not consent and do not accept being continuously exposed to this radiation.\n\nI support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence.\n\nI urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health.\n\nThank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.","attachments":[],"attachment_inventory":true,"withheld":false,"source":"https://www.regulations.gov/comment/HHS-OASH-2026-0397-4482","tags":["child-development","health-experiences","exposure-places","research-evidence"],"source_hash":"12447551c32c4a64152a3af49279864dafd7d63e82b654fdb49e02c3bbe1afba","slug":"child-development-comment-4482","classification":{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-4482","body_sha256":"ddc8577e5385b7e25ed7af273fd189daaddd711c9b0c545ebe9823b570ad62c6","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"ehs","topics":[{"id":"ehs","evidence":" since there is no escape from it. I am very signifantly sensitive to is and the measures that I am taking are not enough. I am buy"},{"id":"access","evidence":"that I am taking are not enough. I am buying expensive clothes and blankets to shield myself but I am still significantly affected. It's not"},{"id":"infrastructure","evidence":"ility to opt out.  The exposure is crazy and new towers continue to grow everywhere. This needs to stop and it is unlawful because it aff"},{"id":"standards","evidence":"ife became a hell now without my consent and ability to opt out.  The exposure is crazy and new towers continue to grow everywhe"},{"id":"research","evidence":"ther potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health.\n\nThank you for p"}],"summary":"The commenter describes wireless sensitivity, costly shielding and involuntary exposure, opposes continuing tower expansion and supports HHS research and public protection.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-24T20:09:12Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"a570b12b2305754b3b5bea28594ca3f2927f80ac705afd9fb7fe64e18653f965","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"},"forum_topics":["ehs","access","infrastructure","standards","research"],"primary_topic":"ehs","forum_title":"The commenter describes wireless sensitivity, costly shielding and involuntary exposure, opposes continui…"}