{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-4450","body_sha256":"3ad31091044a7cd53f5807e85c3da2ba0d1a2bc42912fc1fb60d75516943d59b","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"environment","topics":[{"id":"environment","evidence":"s and radiation  can disrupt nature’s cycle, especially bees and birds, that would be impacted by this.   Also, if you are not willing "},{"id":"standards","evidence":"e persons knowledge of the ramifications and without their consent.   You want to say what you are doing but not in full transparen"},{"id":"geoengineering","evidence":"nting at the present.   We do not consent to weather manipulation, we do not consent to radio frequency radiation, we do not conse"}],"summary":"The commenter opposes involuntary RF and EMF exposure and weather manipulation, citing concerns about ecological effects, transparency, consent and individual rights.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-24T20:09:12Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"c3ba9bba6e76deab5585390d6a0516c9ddbab39e066f9f2b5630e7d77ae01771","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}