{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-4448","body_sha256":"4b08a69427668ab2994e0e49cc2910e631529c177087a4247eb56e6676d7587f","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"standards","topics":[{"id":"standards","evidence":"al guidelines that are used to determine the safety limits for exposure to wireless radiation are decades old and have not "},{"id":"research","evidence":"alth and the environment. \nWe must have more independent and rigorous transparent research for wireless radiation- particularly in populations such as chil"},{"id":"children","evidence":"diation- particularly in populations such as children and the elderly. \nMost of the outlined research was done 10-15 years ago- which "},{"id":"mechanisms","evidence":"dy researched, I found one study which shows DNA strand damage from \"industry accepted radiation levels\".\n https://pubmed.ncbi."},{"id":"ehs","evidence":"ed.\n\nI myself get severe headaches due to my sensitivity to the electromagnetic radiation.  I avoid staying near cell towers because of these headaches.\nW"},{"id":"neurological","evidence":"this. More research is needed.\n\nI myself get severe headaches due to my sensitivity to the electromagnetic radiation.  I avoid"},{"id":"infrastructure","evidence":"tromagnetic radiation.  I avoid staying near cell towers because of these headaches.\nWhen not near the towers,  I am head"}],"summary":"The commenter criticizes outdated exposure guidelines, calls for independent research on children, older people and biological effects, and reports headaches associated with sensitivity near towers.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-24T20:09:12Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"142d039efdfd451196c6889a614db6c15179baa4738ec0d1af004484daa7f91e","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}