{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-4269","body_sha256":"1dc74dc98d5299e7ed64dabe267cd567be5500d6b14693b3f7e95c4de194c504","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"research","topics":[{"id":"research","evidence":" 24/7? We must bring this issue to light and conduct thorough testing on the effects of these technologies. Isn't this what the HHS is"},{"id":"standards","evidence":"ising that these technologies were initially tested solely for their ability to heat human tissue. Is that true science, or"},{"id":"environment","evidence":"not only human health but also the health of plants, animals, and insects. As a precaution, I have limited my use of these technologies.\n\n"},{"id":"children","evidence":"rrent research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding"},{"id":"occupational","evidence":"ed all their issues. Additionally, there are firefighters who have sued due to health problems linked to these emitters at their fire st"}],"summary":"The commenter reports no personal adverse effects but advocates precaution, criticizes heating-focused testing, cites accounts of harm and requests broader HHS research on people and ecosystems.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-24T20:09:12Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"7d67208dfdb4e090f831d6fd2342ffd58dab5506e994db4f453733a2e4edfe93","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}