{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-4144","number":"4144","name":"maria tortu","organization":"","posted":"2026-10-22T04:00Z","received":"2026-10-15T04:00Z","body":"I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure.\n\nI am responding from the perspective of a concerned member of the public.\n\n\nPeople are affected by wireless radiation whether they are aware of it or not. It has never been properly studied and should never have been approved for use without proper unbiased safety studies. I believe HHS should address this issue before the planned 6G rollout. I don't believe \"technological progress\" should be allowed to supersede the health of people and the planet.\n\nI support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence.\n\nI urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health.\n\nThank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.","attachments":[],"attachment_inventory":true,"withheld":false,"source":"https://www.regulations.gov/comment/HHS-OASH-2026-0397-4144","tags":["child-development","research-evidence"],"source_hash":"c3b9d25897fbf2469198b7515600a124ff5bb5c10daa06bc280b8a8cf56690c1","slug":"child-development-comment-4144","classification":{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-4144","body_sha256":"a56d636fa6b04191beb38964b0236fbd4cdacc017b12aa82517703cdd1f40ce1","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"research","topics":[{"id":"research","evidence":"uld never have been approved for use without proper unbiased safety studies. I believe HHS should address this issue before the planned 6G r"},{"id":"standards","evidence":" not. It has never been properly studied and should never have been approved for use without proper unbiased safety studies. I believe HHS sh"},{"id":"environment","evidence":"progress\" should be allowed to supersede the health of people and the planet.\n\nI support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential"},{"id":"children","evidence":"rrent research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding"}],"summary":"The commenter calls for unbiased safety studies before a planned 6G rollout and asks HHS to prioritize public and environmental health and vulnerable populations.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-22T20:03:42Z","review_method":"Complete submitted comment-text review with neutral attributed summaries and exact evidence; attachments and external materials not reviewed.","review_source_sha256":"1918ae89da2f135ffed95e08807da15267b25bde712f441b3f5515f9cf441793","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"},"forum_topics":["research","standards","environment","children"],"primary_topic":"research","forum_title":"The commenter calls for unbiased safety studies before a planned 6G rollout and asks HHS to prioritize pu…"}