{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-3011","body_sha256":"9bad07150d19807eadf7b30771365e074fdbd3226889d17981ac8b25e9efca6f","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"standards","topics":[{"id":"standards","evidence":"end that Congress consider updating the Telecommunications Act of 1996 so that health, environmental, and wildlife concern"},{"id":"infrastructure","evidence":"m raising health concerns when opposing towers, even when those concerns are legitimate. Technology has c"},{"id":"environment","evidence":"e for families, children, older adults, wildlife, and the environment. This pattern places a growing burden "},{"id":"children","evidence":"rs that increase exposure for families, children, older adults, wildlife, and the environment. This pattern "},{"id":"research","evidence":" reasons, I respectfully request a deep federal study of RF exposure impacts, including long‑term effects on huma"}],"summary":"Requests protective tower siting, long-term human and ecological studies and updates to the Telecommunications Act so communities can raise health and environmental concerns.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-15T03:51:16Z","review_method":"Source-based AI review of complete published comment bodies; exact topic evidence; attachments and external links not reviewed.","review_source_sha256":"90f439d2eeaf5afdf8eb50247854136dd1c92d72e62b4d443904497f8cdb2f44","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}