{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-1871","body_sha256":"d093d8651194bc547dfb2380d03bb2b70f89646a703d360799ee4687fc066a9a","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"children","topics":[{"id":"children","evidence":"frastructure, particularly as they relate to children.\nFor years, Children’s Health Defense has heard firsth"},{"id":"reproductive","evidence":"ation, particularly the effects on children, pregnant women, and other vulnerable populations.\nAdditionally, it is"},{"id":"standards","evidence":"government authorities.\nThe FCC’s current RF exposure guidelines were established in 1996 and are fundamentally flawed "},{"id":"research","evidence":"wireless environments. That means supporting independent research into the health and developmental effects of RF radiat"},{"id":"infrastructure","evidence":"ealth consequences of the rapid expansion of wireless infrastructure, particularly as they relate to children.\nFor years, C"},{"id":"environment","evidence":" clearly demonstrates harm to people and the environment. Furthermore, federal regulatory agencies have yet to "}],"summary":"Writing as Children’s Health Defense leadership, calls for precaution, updated biologically relevant standards and transparent independent research, emphasizing children, pregnancy and cumulative exposure.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-08T18:48:04Z","review_method":"Complete published comment-body review; exact prior-reviewed body matches reuse source-supported reviews with each distinct official ID preserved. Attachments and external links not reviewed.","review_source_sha256":"2b4073cb8819fa0b730f7041d0481b47733ac307b0376c83b5562272bcffdbfc","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}