{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-1837","body_sha256":"bb51c665fa2e1165f14aa53a99de8265520e4960123322a828e20b1860b2d618","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"children","topics":[{"id":"children","evidence":"I am a parent of two elementary-school children, commenting on HHS-OASH-2026-0397.\n\nI support wireless"},{"id":"standards","evidence":"or developing brains and bodies. That is the precautionary principle, and it is the right standard for this RFI.\n\nU.S. radi"},{"id":"research","evidence":"ch standard actually rests on.\n\nSecond, fund independent research on long-term, low-level exposure in children and adole"},{"id":"neurological","evidence":"ent federal limits affects neurodevelopment, sleep, attention, and mitochondrial function? How should cumulative exp"},{"id":"mechanisms","evidence":"ects neurodevelopment, sleep, attention, and mitochondrial function? How should cumulative exposure from phones, routers, "},{"id":"optical","evidence":"ning the technology: distance from the body, wired connections where feasible, routers and devices out of sleeping ar"}],"summary":"A parent supports wireless technology but requests precaution for children, independent long-term research, international comparisons, practical exposure reduction and child-specific assessment.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-07T16:33:06Z","review_method":"Complete published comment-body review; exact prior-reviewed body matches reuse source-supported reviews with each distinct official ID preserved. Attachments and external links not reviewed.","review_source_sha256":"1a64b9aeeeb75718608d4ac37ea719ded1c26c6a09e072a42af45110b464f79d","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}