{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-1751","body_sha256":"1c88422fb9b692f5f3ac3458ac7f7989cfb6f027d98beb96c70b54322605a96b","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"section-704","topics":[{"id":"section-704","evidence":"ies to support 'No704'.  Here is just one -\n\nSection 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, codified as Com"},{"id":"standards","evidence":" are left without remedies or compensation.\n\nFCC guidelines are outdated, do not take children into account, and f"},{"id":"children","evidence":"harm children’s health and the environment.\n\nChildren harmed by RF radiation exposure are left without remedies or "},{"id":"environment","evidence":"eless service facilities on the basis of the environmental effects of radio frequency emissions to the extent t"}],"summary":"Argues that Section 704 and federal preemption remove local control and remedies for RF injuries, particularly involving children, and calls for dismantling that legal framework.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-07T16:33:06Z","review_method":"Complete published comment-body review; exact prior-reviewed body matches reuse source-supported reviews with each distinct official ID preserved. Attachments and external links not reviewed.","review_source_sha256":"60817c7d5a1d314aba41b2433fb80717cfee825a147565697d6f13183ea5b7b3","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}