{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-0535","body_sha256":"21594db51591212543439473f3569211eb4f8ae495e173915e9febcce805f64a","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"standards","topics":[{"id":"standards","evidence":"new standards must be based on the biological cellular effect"},{"id":"ehs","evidence":"diagnosed as having electromagnetic hypersensitivity"},{"id":"wifi","evidence":"Wi-Fis"},{"id":"infrastructure","evidence":"cell towers"},{"id":"electricity","evidence":"wiring and equipment"},{"id":"environment","evidence":"Animals and plants"}],"summary":"Reports a diagnosis of electromagnetic hypersensitivity and asks HHS to lead biologically based exposure protections, criticizing FCC limits and response to the court remand.","reviewed_at":"2026-09-23T15:03:52Z","review_method":"ChatGPT full source-text review of September 23 11 a.m. export","review_source_sha256":"82fdf0b3b6a9f5041ed5ad8a6a65685138a1174251d36ecb973a9a6f5106dcdb","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}