{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-0518","body_sha256":"013db98cedc7d39929f110bfc46054340189396986dbb180f748474467ec5041","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"research","topics":[{"id":"research","evidence":"review the effects, symptoms, and published studies"},{"id":"standards","evidence":"regulatory exposure limited need to be revised"},{"id":"children","evidence":"kindergartens, schools"},{"id":"environment","evidence":"health and environmental effects"}],"summary":"A commenter with experience assessing fields in buildings reports improvement after exposure reduction and requests review of non-thermal effects, lower limits and protection for children.","reviewed_at":"2026-09-23T15:03:52Z","review_method":"ChatGPT full source-text review of September 23 11 a.m. export","review_source_sha256":"41c1c6db911daff753ecd3b9ed71291a6a62a82e3e466d976264e7ab3a7b5f47","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}