{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-0366","body_sha256":"afaeaa4a8b99b0888ee48d85da5b59ad466510c1c3f98b95ad60a00f0f399bde","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"research","topics":[{"id":"research","evidence":"As a healthcare professional, I strongly support HHS conducting a rigorous, independent, evidence-based review."},{"id":"children","evidence":"We should study long-term exposure, children, occupational risks, and emerging technologies."},{"id":"occupational","evidence":"As a healthcare professional, I strongly support HHS conducting a rigorous, independent, evidence-based review."},{"id":"mechanisms","evidence":"We should examine actual exposure levels, frequencies, power densities, duration, modulation, cumulative exposure, and potential biological effects."}],"summary":"A healthcare professional calls for independent, reproducible research that measures actual exposure and distinguishes hypotheses and biological effects from demonstrated health hazards.","reviewed_at":"2026-09-22T14:53:58Z","review_method":"AI-assisted full comment-body review with exact source passages; September 22 CSV update","review_source_sha256":"7eccd3a666bda111ef0ea56f334756acf19f4ed2f907f5c986edbddb76270a24","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}