{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-0057","body_sha256":"9b2f465148b6240d1aa35586e7f691a46b51d0f371051ae91756860ea7d2687c","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"research","topics":[{"id":"research","evidence":"Comment to HHS: RF Radiation and Public Health\n\nI am submitting this comment in response to HHS's Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields, Radiofrequency Radiation, and Wireless Radiat"},{"id":"standards","evidence":"Non-thermal biological effects are real. Current FCC standards assume only heat-generating exposures cause harm. Becker demonstrated biological responses to electromagnetic fields at intensit"},{"id":"children","evidence":"lution limits were influenced by the industries being regulated, and drew a direct comparison with Eastern European nations where more independent scientists arrived at far stricter exposure limits.\n\nWhistleblowers are punished. After testifying that power line fields pose"},{"id":"mechanisms","evidence":"dations for this RFI is the research of Robert O. Becker, M.D., an orthopedic surgeon and bioelectricity pioneer, detailed in his landmark 1985 book The Body Electric: Electromagnetism and the Foundation of Life.\n\nBecker's central finding: living organisms are fundamentally electr"}],"summary":"The commenter invokes Robert Becker's bioelectricity research to argue for nonthermal-effect studies, independent oversight, precaution and a system for documenting reported injuries.","reviewed_at":"2026-09-22T01:54:07Z","review_method":"AI source-text review; explicit topic passages; 2026-09-22","review_source_sha256":"c48ed53ac6a564518ed7d425b86adf3da8bd86bc2d237c24f33dbecb5abbb8d6","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}