{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-6711","body_sha256":"d51b9b1b09af61de52ff805e34bb1b9d6d531d20bcac9edfd5072ae0cd530f5b","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"smart-meters","topics":[{"id":"smart-meters","evidence":"right to retain an analog utility meter"},{"id":"standards","evidence":"These policies deserve regulatory review"},{"id":"research","evidence":"prioritize research into the potential effects"},{"id":"environment","evidence":"pollinator health"},{"id":"electricity","evidence":"\"dirty electricity,\" voltage transients"}],"summary":"Describes successful analog-meter advocacy and concern about opt-out fees, reports accounts of symptoms without claiming causation, and requests independent research on neurological, electrical and ecological effects and protection of consumer choice.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-28T23:54:32Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"07763ed44cabf7f6ff59fcd2b3ce8c5bcce13cb5dc9a0eeffb43cfe9c7ba671a","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}