{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-6679","body_sha256":"1ea9c96527f7642b009781b5bba66383ede75a8330ed7ed45d8839713b8f044b","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"standards","topics":[{"id":"standards","evidence":"current evidence and large studies strongly suggest that FCC's current RF standards are safe"},{"id":"research","evidence":"independent and agnostic about any single potential cause"},{"id":"ehs","evidence":"Studies have not confirmed EMF hypersensitivity."},{"id":"other","evidence":"financial risks from anxiety over RF are real"}],"summary":"Argues that existing RF standards are supported by evidence and that behavioral phone risks deserve priority. Requests independent holistic study of reported symptoms, rigorous methods and protection against exploitative RF-safety products.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-28T23:54:32Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"8fe348b6d76173f895dd5e435671be082c953bd76f90cef93ed9b8beffadc1c3","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}