{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-6558","number":"6558","name":"Shanda Ezell","organization":"","posted":"2026-10-28T04:00Z","received":"2026-10-21T04:00Z","body":"I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.\nThe Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer. Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.\nThe FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment.\nHere is some information I believe the FCC should review when addressing the concerns about wireless radiation: PLEASE read these links then read my story. I wish I could tell you my whole story but hopefully this is enough for you to see the similarities. See the connection. See this is real. We are real. You want proof? Here I am... \nElectromagnetic Hypersensitivity: Exploring The Condition\n\nElectromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS, microwave syndrome) - Review of mechanisms - PubMed\n","attachments":["https://downloads.regulations.gov/HHS-OASH-2026-0397-6558/attachment_1.pdf"],"attachment_inventory":true,"withheld":false,"source":"https://www.regulations.gov/comment/HHS-OASH-2026-0397-6558","tags":["cancer-tumors","child-development","health-experiences","policy-standards","research-evidence"],"source_hash":"2ab8243cda6e0450383755427a476a3436511f247bc97fa21c4e37b2fe03d952","slug":"cancer-tumors-comment-6558","classification":{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-6558","body_sha256":"2d8ff81349e939c2e26f705cd2255c6b19c7247422569556cbbebd0ba71653ea","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"standards","topics":[{"id":"standards","evidence":"D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand"},{"id":"ehs","evidence":"Electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS, microwave syndrome)"},{"id":"children","evidence":"impacts of RF radiation on children"}],"summary":"The commenter asks the FCC to address its court remand, consider health and environmental evidence, and review material concerning electromagnetic hypersensitivity. The body refers to a personal story but does not supply its details.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-28T23:54:32Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"e392770798f61fc45bd7115cdb9402a2ccdd890715a7562cb21281f37d9e74f0","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"},"forum_topics":["standards","ehs","children"],"primary_topic":"standards","forum_title":"The commenter asks the FCC to address its court remand, consider health and environmental evidence, and r…"}